Green At Work Magazine
Premier Corporate Sustainability Publication
 
NEWS AND INFORMATION
Between Blue and Yellow
Newslines
Corporate Acts
Read On
Green Gateways
GREEN@WORK MAGAZINE
Back Issues
On Our Covers
Feature Stories
Headlines
Special Section
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is an idea that corporations have to consider the interests of customers, employees, shareholders, communities, and ecological considerations in all
Read More >>
Socially responsible investing (SRI) describes an investment strategy which combines the intentions to maximize both financial return and social good.
Read More >>


green@work : Magazine : Back Issues : Nov/Dec 2001 : Reinventing Step Five

Feature Story
Reinventing the World: Step Five

This “eco-effective” material changed the carpet industry. Now it calls for a shift in sustainable design.


by William McDonough and Michael Braungart

 

Editor’s Note: This is the final article of a five-part series examining a new vision of industry that celebrates natural, cultural and economic abundance. The first two installments explored the authors’ views of what they describe as the unproductive “free of . . .” strategy incorporated by many companies, as well as how personal preferences (based on scientific experience) can help make the best choices among products available today. The third article explored the concept of “passive positives,” and the fourth examined “active positives.” This final installment gives specific steps to take for reinvention.

Designers are uniquely empowered to act on their hopes. As the creators of products and systems for the built environment, they are the dreamers who transform inspiration into the cherished things we use every day, the places in which we live and work and our much-loved modes of communication and mobility.

We could say, in fact, that design conceives our future; it is the first signal of human intention, and it sets in motion a whole range of effects that ripple through human communities and the natural world of today, tomorrow and, in some cases, nearly forever.

If Steps One through Four represent a dinner of ever-increasing pleasures, Step Five is more than dessert—it’s a party.   So what kind of future do we want to conceive? How can we act intelligently on our hopes to create a world of prosperity, abundance and delight? In this, the last of a five-part series on ecologically intelligent design—what we call eco-effectiveness—we suggest some of the ways in which true innovation can achieve a broad spectrum of positive, regenerative effects on the world, allowing commerce, community and nature to thrive and grow.

The Five-step Path
Our five-step strategy of eco-effective design describes a process in which designers employ an ever-broadening ability to define, select and, ultimately, reinvent product ingredients, industrial systems and even the relationships between producers and customers. Its intention is nothing less than the transformation of human industry; it seeks a world in which the production and consumption of goods is not only safe and profitable, but also ecologically enriching and socially valuable.

As you may recall, the first step in the strategy aims to remove from a product a specific chemical widely known to be harmful, such as lead or chlorine. The second step begins a more comprehensive review in which a customer or manufacturer makes a list of preferred, readily available materials known to be safely created or harvested with minimal negative impact.

Moving along the five-step path, designers begin to examine all of a product’s “ingredients” rather than simply removing the most onerous substances or adding a few elements that are “less bad.”

At Step Three, designers examine the palette of materials used in an existing product while it continues to be manufactured—the goal is to replace problematic ingredients without missing a beat in the marketplace. A company that manufactures polyester fabric, for example, can keep its machines humming as it replaces the input of a dangerous polymer with one that does not contain substances of serious concern.

Step Four is the true entry into eco-effective design. At this point in the journey, designers aim to actively define a product’s ingredients, right from the start. The idea is not to limit the impact of a product or system, but to conceive one with positive effects on the world. A designer aiming for positive effects employs the intelligence of natural systems—such as the effectiveness of nutrient cycling or the abundance of the sun’s energy—to create products actively defined as nutrients for the earth’s two discrete metabolisms: the cycles of nature and industry.

Design conceives our future; it is the first signal of human intention, and it sets in motion a whole range of effects that ripple through human communities and the natural world of today, tomorrow and, in some cases, nearly forever.

In a world of what we call cradle-to-cradle design, a product’s biological and technical nutrients would flow in one or the other of these discrete, closed-loop cycles, providing nourishment for something new after each useful life. In the textile industry, for instance, we’ve helped companies conceive fabrics as both biological and technical nutrients—food for local soils and rematerialized ingredients for industry, respectively.

And now we come to Step Five—true innovation.

The Fruits of Reinvention
We’ve used the preparation of a meal as a metaphor for the step-by-step process of eco-effective design. At each phase, the designer—the host and chef—begins to create the meal by asking the simple question, “What is my intention?” Aiming to be “free of” a dangerous ingredient at Step One, her meal might have resembled a humble dinner prepared to avoid an offending food—a meal without meat, dairy or sugar. Moving through the steps, the chef’s choices widen as she identifies new intentions. By Step Four, she is actively choosing ingredients to create a meal that is nourishing, tasty and fulfilling.

If Steps One through Four represent a dinner of ever-increasing pleasures, Step Five is more than dessert—it’s a party.

From a design perspective, embracing a festive spirit means bringing inventive energy to the table and asking not simply what ingredients would be nutritious, but how a product or service might best celebrate a basic human need, revitalize an aspect of culture or renew our engagement with the natural world. One might begin to ask, “How might my product fulfill people’s wants, needs and loves? Are my current business practices the best way to provide my service to customers? What service am I providing, anyway?”

What if we sought a bigger ecological footprint? Materials and products designed as nutrients can actually make humanity a regenerative force.

Consider the automobile. We don’t have to list the ways in which car owners have begun to feel that their need for mobility is in conflict with their desire for a convivial, healthy world. But rather than declare cars the enemy, we suggest that cars are just not serving our needs very effectively. They’re ripe for innovation.

A designer might respond to this challenge by creating a more efficient car that has a minimal impact on the environment, such as a hydrogen-powered hyper car free of carbon emissions. One could also employ a preference for a safe, organic upholstery fabric or begin to reassess each material used in the making of automobiles. Ultimately, manufacturers might optimize their vehicles by using positively defined biological and technical nutrients and creating a coherent system for the retrieval and reuse of the cars’ valuable materials.

Each of these solutions reflects one of the values on the step-by-step path of eco-effective design. Together, they add up to revolutionary changes—changes on which we are actively working so we can bring them to car manufacturers and auto parts suppliers. But we think there’s yet another crucial step: what if we thought of the auto industry not simply as a maker of cars, but as a provider of mobility? How might the industry best provide the service of mobility to meet the wants, needs and loves of its customers? Could we design new kinds of mobility systems that serve a rich social agenda?

Well, yes.

If we explore not just the car, but also the many needs it fulfills, we can begin to imagine the reinvention of the whole paradigm of transportation.

As a mobility provider, for example, a manufacturer might offer customers access to many different kinds of vehicles rather than just selling them a car. Why own and maintain three cars when you could use the service of a big, spacious vehicle for family trips; a sports car for a weekend date; or a public community car to transport your children? In each case you’d be provided the service of mobility by an automaker that owned and reused the vehicles’ valuable materials and utilized them effectively by keeping their resources in motion.

Take the community car. As part of a broadly defined local or regional transportation plan, a fleet of community cars could provide people a range of services throughout the day. Responding to electronic calls, the cars could deliver people to transportation hubs in the morning; ferry groceries, laundry and prescriptions during the day; deliver children from school to violin practice or their grandmother’s house in the late afternoon; and take couples to the movies at night.

Built and used within an evolving system of coherent material flows, the community cars could manifest a wide spectrum of positive effects. People formerly excluded from transportation—children, the elderly, the handicapped— would have ready access to mobility. Plus, the retirees operating the community cars would be able to maintain their sense of community and their ties to the young. The system’s effectiveness—its ability to both optimize the use of materials and conveniently move people to the places they want to go—would generate wealth for providers as well as satisfaction, free time and peace of mind for customers.

The reinvention of mobility illustrates a key principle of eco-effective innovation: products are essentially packaging for services. With this in mind, designers can begin to apply the five steps to all products of service, conceiving effective, intelligent systems for meeting the most basic human needs—like washing one’s clothes.

A designer developing an eco-effective laundry detergent, for example, might follow steps one through four to progressively create a product with only safe, nutritious ingredients. A step-four soap might be defined by the chemistry of the local water supply. It might also be produced locally in dry pellet form and sold in bulk, obviating the need for packaging and the expensive long-distance transportation of heavy liquid concentrates.

At Step Five, one might build on the reformulation of soap to develop a strategy for delivering an effective laundering service to the home. This strategy would include the washing machine itself, which would be conceived as a product of service designed for retrieval, disassembly and reuse. The machine would be delivered to a customer’s home pre-loaded with detergent for 1,000 loads of laundry—the customer pays not for the machine, but for the service. After the last of the machine’s micro-filtered detergent has been dispensed, the appliance would be serviced or replaced, and its valuable materials would enter the technical metabolism to be used again in new machines.

An innovative commercial venture might focus on providing a community laundry service. Laundry could be picked up from customers in a community vehicle and delivered to one location, where washing machines would run on the power of the sun and wastewater would be purified by a system of botanical gardens. The service might even provide a social venue where those who chose to wash their own clothes could relax in a pleasant courtyard among the garden’s flowering plants. Washing clothes, long considered environmentally unfriendly, suddenly begins to generate community wealth.

A Hopeful Agenda
When companies adopt an eco-effective strategy and engage in meeting customers’ needs with a broadly conceived, positive agenda, they are charting a course that departs from the conventional notion of sustainability or efficiency. Sustainability, after all, is merely a minimum precondition of survival—hardly an enticing prospect. Indeed, if minimizing the human impact on the world through ever more efficient design guided our vision, it would be difficult to imagine a hopeful future.

If, for example, the U.S. embraced efficiency and dramatically cut energy consumption and waste production down to current European levels, it would not forestall destruction nor significantly shrink our ecological footprint. The kinds of efficiencies required to sustain the current industrial system would have to be much more draconian, like cutting the population by 75 percent. In such a world, celebrations of abundance, cultural diversity and the lives of our children could only be muted, at best.

But what if we sought a bigger ecological footprint? Materials and products designed as nutrients can actually make humanity a regenerative force. Industrial sites can restore landscapes and invite the return of native species. Buildings can purify water and create more energy than they consume. Nutritious material flows, while supporting life systems, can provide more people with more of what they need and love.

Innovative companies already pursuing these strategies are finding their way by listening to signals from outside the company itself—signals in the community, the environment and the world at large. They are staying on track by allowing a few basic principles to guide their work:

Signal Your Intention—Commit to a new paradigm rather than to an incremental improvement of the old. The eco-effective strategy takes into account that we are not in a perfect world; we are all, in some ways, in transition. But successful ventures, such as the carpet industry’s adoption of a system for the retrieval and reuse of floor covering materials, are showing that embracing real innovation within the context of today’s market is not only possible, it’s the key to a prosperous future.

Restore—Strive for “good growth,” not just economic growth. Innovation allows a company to examine how it might generate community wealth or restore natural systems as it continues to serve its customers. Ford Motor Co., for example, has embarked on the long-term restoration of its historic Rouge River site. Its new assembly plant will feature a roof covered with growing plants—a living roof—that filters storm water runoff in concert with porous paving and a series of wetlands and swales. Replacing the expensive technical controls called for by new regulations, these measures stand to save Ford up to $35 million while purifying the waters flowing into the Rouge.

Feed Forward—Perfecting an existing product is not necessarily a good investment. Maybe it’s time to create a new niche. Currently, many designers are productively engaged in developing safe dyes for fabric. But what if dye were obsolete? We looked to birds for guidance on that question and learned that the brilliance of avian plumage is a prismatic effect; birds’ feathers are essentially clear and reflect different parts of the spectrum. Imagine polymers designed in various crystalline shapes shimmering with color. Imagine light replacing chemicals in the textile industry.

Prepare for the Learning Curve—Recognize that change is difficult, messy and time consuming. Nike is currently working on a number of initiatives, such as designing shoe materials for true recycling, which will take time to come to fruition. The company is well aware that innovation typically has a success rate of about 10 to 15 percent, so it is initiating many pilot programs to understand the dynamics of its future product take-back program. But still, the company presses on. As Nike’s Darcy Winslow says, “This is not about compliance, it’s about leadership.”

Celebrate Your Legacy—Understand and celebrate the far-reaching impact of your creative acts. Design can create effects from the molecule to the region, influencing everything from soil chemistry to the well-being of workers in a sunlit factory. Educator David Orr has pointed out that the design of buildings teaches us about our world—how we use resources, how we relate to nature—and he’s embraced his legacy as a teacher by working with us to conceive a truly innovative university building, a building that is like a tree.

Using nature as a model for design, the building accrues solar income, purifies water, provides habitat for native species and offers a generation of students an opportunity to develop a deep relationship with the natural world.

Accept Intergenerational Responsibility—Orr’s legacy answers the questions posed by our final principle. How can we support the rights of all living things to share in the world’s abundance? How can we love all children of all species for all time? A building that nourishes its surroundings and the minds of those who inhabit it is a step in the right direction. As Orr told green@work, “The X generation doesn’t see much hope in the world. I wanted to give them a sense of hope and the competence to act on that hope. This building gives them possibilities, not just wishful thinking.”

There’s no better way to describe the true intention of innovative design.

<< Part Four  

 


William A. McDonough, FAIA, and Michael Braungart are founders and principals of McDonough Braungart Design Chemistry, a consultancy leading a wide variety of companies into what the two call the “Next Industrial Revolution” by implementing eco-effective design and commerce strategies that will result in a future of sustaining and long-term prosperity. For more information, visit www.mbdc.com.


Home | Magazine | Latest Posts | Current News | Media Kit | Contact
Corporate Social Responsibility | Socially Responsible Investing

© 2000-2017 green@work magazine. All rights reserved.
GreenatWork.com